For years, brand rivalry has been a marketing staple. Think Apple vs. Microsoft, Coke vs. Pepsi, or the classic “Mac vs. PC” ads. These campaigns thrive on contrast, one brand highlighting why it’s better, faster, cooler, or smarter. But in recent years, a surprising new trend has emerged:
brands praising their competitors.
At first glance, it seems counterintuitive. Why would a company promote someone else? Surprisingly, this strategy can strengthen brand identity, boost loyalty, and even increase purchase intent. Here’s how, and when, it works.
From Rivalry to Respect: Two Very Different Branding Moves
Traditional Rivalry: Drawing Lines in the Sand
Old-school rivalry ads succeed because they clearly separate one brand from another. They build tension, spark conversations, and create tribes. Apple’s “I’m a Mac” campaign didn’t just sell computers; it sold a personality.
These tactics can:
- Reinforce loyalty among existing fans
- Make brand differences unmistakably clear
- Generate buzz by tapping into the fun of competition
But they can also feel combative or petty, especially to consumers who aren’t loyal to either side.
The Rise of Competitor Praise: Playing the Long Game
Praising a competitor flips the traditional script. Instead of attacking, brands show generosity, confidence, and even humility. Think of Burger King publicly congratulating McDonald’s or Dove praising other purpose-driven brands.
This approach feels fresh, human, and surprisingly bold. It signals:
- “We’re secure enough to acknowledge others.”
- “We care more about the community than the rivalry.”
- “We’re honest, not just promoting ourselves.”
In a world where consumers value authenticity, that’s powerful.
Why Consumers Actually Love It
So why does this strategy resonate so well? The answer lies in psychology, specifically, automatic processing and thin-slice judgments.
1. Warmth = Trust
Praising a competitor activates what researchers call moral elevation, the good feeling we get from witnessing kindness. When a brand shows generosity, consumers instinctively trust it more.
They think, often unconsciously:
- “This brand seems genuine.”
- “They’re confident, not desperate.”
- “They’re more human than corporate.”
This emotional warmth directly supports long-term loyalty.
2. Thin-Slice Theory: Snap Judgments That Matter
Thin-slice processing means we make extremely quick judgments based on tiny bits of information. When a brand praises a competitor, consumers instantly form impressions like:
- “This feels refreshing.”
- “They must have strong values.”
In those seconds, purchase intent can spike, long before consumers analyze anything logically.
But Sometimes, Praising Competitors Backfires
This strategy isn’t foolproof. It can fail if:
1. The praise is insincere or overly performative
Consumers can smell fake positivity a mile away. If it feels like a PR stunt, it loses impact.
2. It highlights the competitor’s biggest advantage
Accidentally showcasing the rival’s strengths can reinforce the wrong message.
3. The industry demands clear differentiation
Startups or challenger brands often need bold contrast, not friendliness, to stand out.
4. The competitive landscape is too heated
In high-stakes fields (telecom, politics, energy), praise may seem unrealistic or off-brand.
The Bottom Line: Kindness Is a Strategy
Praising competitors doesn’t just make a brand look good, it changes how consumers feel. When done authentically, it builds trust, signals confidence, and makes brands more relatable. As consumers increasingly value transparency and emotional intelligence, competitor praise is becoming more than a trend, it’s a strategic advantage.
In the future, we may see more brands choosing applause over attacks. And honestly? It’s a refreshing shift.
References
Ambler, T., & Burne, T. (1999). The impact of affect on memory of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 25–34.
Ambler, T., & Vakratsas, D. (1999). How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251999
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. Little, Brown and Company.
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251376
Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
Sagarin, B. J., Cialdini, R. B., Rice, W. E., & Serna, S. B. (2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.526
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589
Environmental impact and business 
Leave a comment